Data Visualization and Governance for Higher Education

Answer-ready dashboards built around your institution’s questions, on servers you control.

We work with your leaders and offices to design and build custom dashboards that fit how your institution decides and operates. They run in AdiHub, the Angelsee Data Intelligence Hub, on your own servers, with data governance built into every one, alongside ready-made modules and public benchmarks.

Award Burn Rate
Sample

Pace map

Question: Which awards are spending too fast or too slow for the time that has passed?

Budget spent against time elapsed, one mark per award. The dashed line is on pace.

  • Over budget (13)
  • Projected over (27)
  • May end unspent (53)
  • On pace (246)
  • Too early to judge (28)
Pace map: budget spent against time elapsed, 367 active awardsMost awards sit near the on-pace diagonal. 13 are over budget and 27 are projected to end over; 53 sit well below the line late in their term and may end with money unspent; 28 are too early to judge. The table view lists the count and budget for each group.0%0%25%25%50%50%75%75%100%100%Over budgeton paceAU-24-000476$854K may end unspentTime elapsedBudget spent

Source: Angelsee University award ledger (generated). Data as of Sep 30, 2026. 48 awards that have not started are not plotted.

Sample data. Angelsee University is a fictional institution; every name and number here is generated.
Start here · about 4 weeks

AdiHub Pilot

For any office with one question it needs answered

Before we commit to more, can we see AdiHub answer one of our questions with our own data?

How it runs

We agree one question, or one data set to explore, with you. You send Excel files, or we use public federal data. You see drafts within two weeks, and the dashboards go live before week four.

Built on AdiHub

We host the pilot, so there is nothing to install. No commitment afterwards. If it works, move to custom dashboards or a module on your own servers, take the dashboards with you, and the pilot fee counts toward it.

What you get

  • Up to two dashboards on AdiHub that answer your question or show what your data holds, from your Excel files or public data
  • Access to the public benchmarks in AdiHub, comparing your institution with up to 12 peer institutions
  • Each dashboard with its definitions, sources and checks
  • 60 days of access, hosted by Angelsee, for the people you name
  • A closing summary for your team, written and talked through: what the dashboards found, and what to look at next
Custom dashboards

You ask the questions.
We build the dashboards that answer them.

No two institutions are led or run the same way. We work alongside your cabinet, deans and offices to turn the questions they ask into dashboards that fit your structure, your definitions and your data, then hand them over governed and documented.

  1. Start with the questions

    We meet your leaders and the offices that support them, and write down the questions they need answered, in their own words.

  2. See a draft first

    You comment on a working draft built on sample data before any of your data moves, and we revise until it answers the question.

  3. Build on your data

    We connect your systems or start from the dashboard’s Excel data template, with every data element defined in its governance record.

  4. Certify and hand over

    A second reviewer certifies each dashboard before it goes live, and your staff receive the documentation to run and extend it.

Not sure what to ask yet? Start from your data.

Bring data you think holds an answer, such as five years of course enrollments. Under a signed agreement, we chart it so patterns surface and help your leaders choose the questions worth tracking. Then we build the dashboards that answer them, the same way as above.

Built for
  • President and cabinet
  • Provost and deans
  • Research
  • Finance and budget
  • Enrollment and student success
  • Institutional research
  • Faculty affairs
Every engagement

What every engagement includes

One accountable lead, work you keep

One lead is accountable for scope, schedule and quality, and every dashboard is checked and tested before it reaches you. Every engagement ends with documents and models your staff own and can run without us.

Your data stays under your controls

We work with your records only under a signed agreement and after your security review, and never reuse one institution’s data for another.

Your first year of AdiHub

AdiHub is installed on your own servers or cloud, with a year of updates and support. After that, renewing is your choice, and modules can be added on the data already connected.

Peer comparisons from public data

Every comparison with other institutions uses public federal data, with its source and year.

A growing module library

Start from a module, or from your own questions.

Each module is a set of dashboards built around the core questions an office asks, such as which awards need attention or where students are leaving. It gives you a head start on what to ask and how to show the answer. We then connect it to your data and tailor it to your structure and definitions, the same work as a custom dashboard.

  • Research Administration

    Core questions
    • Which sponsored awards are spending too fast or too slowly for the time left?
    • How does research spending so far this fiscal year compare with the same point in the last two years?
    • How much research spending does each college, department and investigator bring in per square foot of research space?
    • How often are our proposals funded, by year, sponsor and unit?

    Data: Award budgets and spending; proposal records; USAspending and NSF HERD for peers

  • Student Success & Retention

    Core questions
    • How many students return for their second year, by entering class?
    • How many students graduate, by entering class?
    • Where do retention and graduation gaps open between student groups?
    • Which current students show two or more early-alert signals?

    Data: Student records and early-alert records; IPEDS for peers

  • Budgeting & Forecasting

    Core questions
    • How do net tuition and operating margin change under base, conservative and optimistic scenarios?
    • Are we on budget this year, overall and by unit?
    • How does each college’s spending compare with its budget, by month and account?
    • How much tuition revenue do we keep after institutional aid, year by year?

    Data: General ledger and budget; enrollment records; IPEDS Finance for peers

  • Tuition and Enrollment Forecast Model

    Core questions
    • What will enrollment look like over the next five years, by level and residency?
    • What will gross tuition, institutional aid and net tuition revenue be each year?
    • What happens if enrollment, tuition rate, discount rate or state appropriation change?
    • How closely does the model match our last three years of actual results?

    Data: Admissions funnel and enrollment records; tuition, aid and ledger data

  • Public benchmarks

    How does any institution compare with its peers?

    Peer comparisons and research rankings built only from public federal data, each with its source and year.

    Data: NCES IPEDS; NSF HERD; College Scorecard

  • Custom Dashboards

    Executive dashboards for the President, Provost, VP Research, CFO and more

    Built around your institution’s own questions, structure and definitions, with the documentation your staff need to run and extend them. Tell us your questions, and we will show you how we would answer them.

Across the institution

Other modules

Beyond the five modules above, we work with every area of the institution. Each of these starts as custom dashboards on the same hub, with the same data governance. One example question from each, with the data it draws on.

  • Enrollment Management

    Where does our admissions funnel lose the most students, from inquiry to enrolled?

    Data: Admissions records; IPEDS Admissions for peers

  • Academic Affairs

    How are degree completions changing by program and award level over five years?

    Data: IPEDS Completions; student records

  • Student Affairs

    Do orientation and first-year seminar participants come back at higher rates?

    Data: Student records; program rosters

  • Advancement & Alumni Relations

    How many of our donors give again the next year, and which first-time donors are we losing?

    Data: Advancement records

  • Human Resources

    Where is voluntary turnover highest, by employee group and division?

    Data: HR records

  • Information Technology

    How mature is our data governance: named stewards, defined terms, trusted reports?

    Data: Systems inventory; governance records

  • Online & Continuing Education

    How is enrollment shifting between online, hybrid and on-campus courses?

    Data: IPEDS distance-education data; student records

  • Facilities & Operations

    How large is our deferred-maintenance backlog against the value of our buildings?

    Data: Facility condition assessments

  • Legal & Compliance

    Who owns each of our top enterprise risks, and how is mitigation progressing?

    Data: Risk register

  • Athletics

    How much of athletics is funded by institutional support and student fees?

    Data: EADA disclosures; NCAA financial reports

  • Auxiliary Services

    Which auxiliary units cover their own costs, and which need a subsidy?

    Data: General ledger

  • Marketing & Communications

    What does each marketing channel cost per enrolled student?

    Data: Marketing spend; admissions and enrollment records

Inside AdiHub

Answer your questions, for each office on campus.

Charts from executive dashboards for the president, provost, research and faculty offices: the kind of dashboards we build with each institution. Each one names the question it answers and its source. In AdiHub every dashboard is interactive: filter by year, college or department, point at any mark for exact figures, and drill through from the university total to a college, a department, an investigator or a single award. Sample data. Angelsee University is a fictional institution; every name and number here is generated.

PresidentSample

Enrollment and net tuition

Question: Are we going to hit our enrollment and net tuition targets this fall?

Bullet charts for this fall. The bar is this year, the black line the target, the grey band the range of the four years before; the small line at right is the five-year trend. Three of four measures are above target; new first-year students are 80 short.

  • This year
  • Target
  • Range, previous four years
  • Five-year trend

Source: Angelsee University student records and general ledger (generated), Sep 30, 2026.

PresidentSample

Operating spending against budget

Question: Will we balance the budget, and how financially healthy are we?

Projected year-end operating expense, built up from the revised budget by division. Red bars add spending over budget, blue bars are savings; the gold zone marks 1% to 3% over budget, the Watch status.

⚠ WatchProjected 1.1% over budget ($8.9M). Same point in FY2026: 0.3% over.
  • Budget and projection
  • Over budget (+)
  • Under budget (-)
  • Watch zone, 1% to 3% over

Axis starts at $800M. The dashed line is the revised budget.

Source: Angelsee University general ledger (generated), revised budget $812.0M, Sep 30, 2026.

PresidentSample

Student outcomes against peers

Question: Are students staying and graduating, against our targets and our peers?

For each entering cohort, the band is the peer group’s middle half, the tick its median and the dot Angelsee University. Retention is still below the peer median; graduation passed it with the 2018 cohort.

  • Angelsee University (generated)
  • Peer median
  • Peer middle half (25th to 75th percentile)

First-year retention

Full-time, first-time students back the next fall

Six-year graduation rate

Bachelor's within 150% of normal time

* Peer data for the newest cohorts is not public yet. Axes do not start at zero.

Sources: Angelsee University student records (generated), fall census Sep 15, 2026. Peer values are generated for this sample too; in AdiHub they come from NCES IPEDS Fall Enrollment (retention, 2023 cohort, 2024–25 collection) and Graduation Rates (150%, 2018 cohort, 2024–25 collection).

ProvostSample

Early alerts followed up on time

Question: Are first-year students coming back, and who is at risk of leaving?

A funnel for Fall 2025 first-year students with an early alert: each bar is the number left at that step, out of 1,180. Only 76% of alerts were followed up within 14 days, against the 85% target.

283 alerts were not followed up within 14 days. 74% of those students came back for spring, against 90% when the follow-up was on time; 68% when no one followed up at all.

Sources: Angelsee University early-alert and enrollment records (generated), Fall 2024 to Fall 2026 terms and the Spring 2026 census, as of Sep 30, 2026.

Vice President for ResearchSample

Research expenditures, year to date

Question: Are research expenditures up or down against last year?

Running totals from July 1 for this year and the two before. After Sep 30, the dotted navy line projects FY2027 at its current pace against last year, and the shaded band shows the likely range. Spending is ahead of the last two years.

$48.2M by Sep 30, against $45.3M last year +6.3% and $43.0M two years ago; on pace for about $192.7M

  • FY2027 to date
  • FY2027 projection and likely range
  • FY2026
  • FY2025
Research expenditures, cumulative from July 1, FY2025 to FY2027FY2027 to Sep 30: $48.2M, against $45.3M in FY2026 and $43.0M in FY2025 at the same date. FY2026 ended at $181.3M and FY2025 at $176.0M. At the current pace FY2027 is projected to end near $192.7M, likely between $181.9M and $203.6M.$0$50M$100M$150M$200M$250MJulASONDJanFMAMJunSep 30FY2027 projection band: $181.9M to $203.6M by June 30FY2025: ended at $176.0MFY2026: ended at $181.3MFY2027 projected: $192.7MJul FY2027: $16.4M to dateAug FY2027: $32.0M to dateSep FY2027: $48.2M to date$48.2MFY2027 projected$192.7Mrange $181.9–203.6MFY2026 $181.3MFY2025 $176.0M

By source, FY2027 to date

Federal agencies paid 63% of the $48.2M spent by Sep 30, about the same share as all of FY2026 (62%).

Research expenditures by source, FY2027 to Sep 30Federal agencies: $30.4M, 63%; Institution funds: $7.7M, 16%; Business: $3.4M, 7%; Nonprofits: $3.4M, 7%; State and local: $2.4M, 5%; All other: $0.9M, 2%. Total $48.2M.Federal agencies: $30.4M, 63%63%Institution funds: $7.7M, 16%16%Business: $3.4M, 7%Nonprofits: $3.4M, 7%State and local: $2.4M, 5%All other: $0.9M, 2%
Research expenditures by source, FY2027 to Sep 30
SourceTo dateShare
Federal agencies$30.4M63%
Institution funds$7.7M16%
Business$3.4M7%
Nonprofits$3.4M7%
State and local$2.4M5%
All other$0.9M2%
Total$48.2M100%

Source: Angelsee University research expenditure records (generated), Sep 30, 2026, HERD source categories.

Vice President for ResearchSample

Who funds our research

Question: Who funds us, and are we too dependent on one agency?

A treemap of FY2026 R&D expenditures, $181.3M in all: each tile’s area is its share. Federal agencies are navy, other sources teal, and the darker the shade, the larger the share. NIH alone paid 31%, outlined in gold.

  • Federal agency
  • Other source
  • Largest single source
  • Darker shade = larger share
Federal agencies $112.4M · 62%Other sources $68.9M · 38%

Source: Angelsee University research expenditure records (generated), FY2026, HERD source categories.

Faculty affairsSample

Faculty retention over five years

Question: Are we keeping our faculty? Are we keeping tenure-track faculty through tenure?

A dot plot of retention in 2022–23 (open dot) and 2025–26 (filled dot), sorted from highest to lowest, with the change in points at the right. The university passed the 93% target; every college rose, but tenure-track retention fell below the target.

  • 2022–23
  • 2025–26, rose
  • 2025–26, fell
  • Target, 93%
Faculty retention by college, 2022–23 compared with 2025–26University-wide retention, not counting retirements, rose from 91.3% to 93.5% and passed the 93% target. Every college rose; Engineering leads at 95.1% and Health Sciences is lowest at 90.8%, still below target. Tenure-track retention across all colleges fell from 93.8% to 91.4%, below target.88%90%92%94%96%Engineering: 92.8% in 2022–23, 95.1% in 2025–26 (+2.3 points)Engineering95.1% +2.3Arts and Sciences: 91.6% in 2022–23, 94.0% in 2025–26 (+2.4 points)Arts and Sciences94.0% +2.4University: 91.3% in 2022–23, 93.5% in 2025–26 (+2.2 points)University93.5% +2.2Business: 90.2% in 2022–23, 93.2% in 2025–26 (+3.0 points)Business93.2% +3.0Education: 91.0% in 2022–23, 92.6% in 2025–26 (+1.6 points)Education92.6% +1.6Health Sciences: 89.4% in 2022–23, 90.8% in 2025–26 (+1.4 points)Health Sciences90.8% +1.4Tenure-track, all colleges: 93.8% in 2022–23, 91.4% in 2025–26 (−2.4 points)Tenure-track, all colleges91.4% −2.4Target 93%

Source: Angelsee University HR records (generated sample), as of Sep 30, 2026.

Faculty affairsSample

Departures by reason, with hires

Question: Why are faculty leaving (retirement, resignation, non-renewal)? Are we hiring enough to replace who leaves?

Full-time faculty who left during each academic year, by reason, and the new full-time faculty who started the next fall. Retirements sit on top, apart from other departures; each year's total is under its label. Median years at departure (not counting retirements) is in the table view.

  • Resignation
  • Non-renewal
  • Other (death, disability, dismissal)
  • Retirement, counted separately
  • New hires
Faculty departures by reason and new hires, 2021–22 to 2025–26Departures peaked at 123 in 2022–23 and fell to 101 in 2025–26: 49 resignations, 11 non-renewals, 5 other and 36 retirements. Hires were above departures every year; 112 new faculty started in Fall 2026.0501001502021–22103 left2022–23123 left2023–24115 left2024–25107 left2025–26101 leftHires 112Retirement 36Other 5Non-renewal 11Resignation 49

Source: Angelsee University HR records (generated sample), as of Sep 30, 2026.

Explore the modules
Public benchmarks

See where you stand with public data.

Compare your institution with up to 25 peers using federal data. Every panel names its survey, component, data year and release status.

HERD · 49 of the 50 largest R1 universitiesPublic

Sensitivity to federal cuts

Question: How much of our research rests on federal money, and is the rest growing fast enough to absorb a cut?

49 of the 50 R1 universities with the most R&D, each sized by what it spends, against the medians of all 146 R1s. 15 of them take more than the median share of their R&D from federal sources and grew more slowly than the median since FY2019. Together they spend $20.2B a year.

  • One university, sized by FY2024 R&D
  • Medians of all 146 R1s: 51% federal, +40% growth
  • Most exposed
Federal share of R&D against five-year R&D growth, 49 of the 50 largest R1 universitiesEach circle is one of 49 of the 50 R1 universities with the most R&D in FY2024 (Nebraska is left out; see the note below the chart), sized by its R&D. Dashed lines mark the medians of all 146 R1 universities: 51% federal and +40% growth since FY2019. 15 of them are above the federal-share median and below the growth median; together they spend $20.2 billion a year.0%+20%+40%+60%+80%+100%+120%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%Federal share of FY2024 R&D →R&D growth, FY2019 to FY2024 →R1 median 51% federalDiversifyingless federal, faster growthMost exposedJohns HopkinsPennMichiganU. of WashingtonOhio StateDukeGeorgia TechHarvardVanderbiltMIT
View as table
49 of the 50 largest R1 research spenders, FY2024 (Nebraska left out; see the note)
UniversityFY2024 R&DFederal shareGrowth since FY2019Most exposed
Johns Hopkins University$4.13B87.6%+41.5%No
University of Pennsylvania$2.17B47.0%+43.9%No
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor$2.11B55.2%+26.0%Yes
University of Wisconsin-Madison$1.93B48.1%+49.0%No
University of California-Los Angeles$1.90B51.7%+45.2%No
University of California-San Diego$1.88B61.2%+39.0%Yes
University of Washington-Seattle Campus$1.69B67.2%+18.6%Yes
Stanford University$1.64B61.7%+36.4%Yes
Cornell University$1.61B49.1%+41.0%No
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill$1.60B59.4%+38.6%Yes
Ohio State University-Main Campus$1.58B49.0%+70.2%No
Duke University$1.58B65.8%+28.9%Yes
University of Maryland-College Park$1.54B59.9%+40.4%No
Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus$1.53B79.4%+59.2%No
Yale University$1.52B55.6%+41.7%No
University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus$1.50B64.3%+39.2%Yes
New York University$1.50B53.7%+60.6%No
Harvard University$1.49B45.0%+20.6%No
Columbia University in the City of New York$1.45B74.3%+44.4%No
University of Minnesota-Twin Cities$1.41B53.1%+39.1%Yes
Texas A&M University-College Station$1.39B41.8%+46.4%No
Vanderbilt University$1.33B61.0%+70.9%No
Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus$1.30B65.9%+37.2%Yes
University of Florida$1.27B45.7%+37.0%No
University of Southern California$1.26B58.5%+39.0%Yes
Northwestern University$1.26B58.5%+46.8%No
Emory University$1.25B59.7%+56.8%No
Washington University in St Louis$1.24B66.1%+40.1%No
The University of Texas at Austin$1.14B60.4%+64.3%No
University of California-Berkeley$1.13B46.0%+40.3%No
Massachusetts Institute of Technology$1.07B55.8%+5.6%Yes
University of Arizona$1.01B46.6%+37.9%No
University of California-Davis$1.01B50.3%+25.1%No
Arizona State University Campus Immersion$1.00B39.5%+56.9%No
Michigan State University$0.93B50.9%+28.4%No
Purdue University-Main Campus$0.93B48.5%+40.3%No
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign$0.91B56.4%+33.8%Yes
Indiana University-Bloomington$0.90B50.9%+34.2%No
University of Alabama at Birmingham$0.87B57.5%+42.4%No
Rutgers University-New Brunswick$0.84B48.8%+27.3%No
University of Virginia-Main Campus$0.81B48.5%+32.5%No
University of Utah$0.79B57.4%+31.3%Yes
Boston University$0.78B53.8%+46.8%No
University of Colorado Denver/Anschutz Medical Campus$0.77B67.5%+41.1%No
University of Cincinnati-Main Campus$0.74B55.6%+39.7%Yes
University of Colorado Boulder$0.72B79.1%+39.7%Yes
North Carolina State University at Raleigh$0.72B44.1%+32.5%No
University of Iowa$0.70B48.1%+38.4%No
University of Chicago$0.68B74.1%+48.3%No

Public data: NSF NCSES Higher Education Research and Development (HERD) Survey, FY2019 and FY2024, final. R1: the 146 universities the Carnegie 2021 Basic Classification places in Doctoral Universities: Very High Research Activity, as carried in NCES IPEDS Institutional Characteristics 2025-26, provisional; all 146 have HERD data for both years. Medians are of those 146. The University of Colorado Denver/Anschutz Medical Campus is counted as both its HERD units in both years. Growth is not adjusted for inflation. HERD reports some universities together with their medical or health science centers. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln is left out: from FY2024 HERD reports it together with its Medical Center, so its growth since FY2019 is not comparable.

IPEDS · 512 public four-year universitiesPublic

Graduation Rate vs Core Expense

Question: For what we spend per student, do we graduate more or fewer students than other public universities?

Across public universities, each doubling of core spending per student comes with about 11 more points of six-year graduation, yet spending explains only 22% of the differences. At the same spending, 51 universities graduate well above the trend and 51 well below it.

  • One public university
  • Trend
  • Middle 80% around the trend
Six-year graduation rate against core spending per student, four-year universities512 public four-year universities with at least 1,000 FTE students. Graduation rises about 11 points with each doubling of core spending per FTE student; spending accounts for 22% of the differences. The shaded band holds the middle 80% around the trend; 51 universities sit above it and 51 below it.0%20%40%60%80%100%$10K$20K$50K$100K$200KCore expenses per FTE student, FY2024 (log scale) →Six-year graduation rate →51 above the bandgraduate more than their spending predicts51 below the bandgraduate fewer than their spending predictsTrend
View as table
Six-year graduation rate by core spending per FTE student, public four-year universities, FY2024
Core spending per FTEUniversitiesMedian graduationMiddle half
Under $15K2143%32% to 46%
$15K to $25K19551%41% to 58%
$25K to $40K16852%43% to 59%
$40K to $75K10767%54% to 76%
$75K and over2187%75% to 93%

Public data: NCES IPEDS Graduation Rates 2024 (derived; bachelor’s within 150% of normal time) and Finance FY2024 (derived), both provisional. Public four-year universities with at least 1,000 FTE students in the Carnegie 2021 Basic doctoral, master's and baccalaureate (arts and sciences, diverse fields) classes; one with a reported 0% rate is left out. Core expenses include research and public service, which raises spending at research universities.

  • Peer BuilderPick any institution and a peer group, then compare enrollment, retention, graduation, admissions and spending per student.NCES IPEDS · 3,797 degree-granting institutions
  • R&D RankingsSee how universities rank on research spending, how one university’s spending has changed, and where its research money comes from.NSF NCSES HERD Survey · FY2019–FY2024
  • Tuition and Discount RatePublished tuition and fees next to what an institution keeps after its own aid, with the tuition discount rate compared against peers.NCES IPEDS Institutional Characteristics and Finance
  • Faculty to Student RatioCompare any institution’s faculty-to-student ratio with its peers, and see how it has changed over time.NCES IPEDS Fall Enrollment · student-to-faculty ratio
Data governance

Numbers everyone can trust, with governance built in.

Leaders and staff can see where every number comes from, what it means and that it has been checked. AdiHub does the governance work behind the scenes, so your people can focus on the answers.

What leaders and staff see

  • The source and data date on every panel
  • A plain-language definition behind every metric
  • The same metrics at every level, from an individual investigator up to the whole university
  • Quality-check results, with small groups hidden to protect privacy
  • A Certified mark on every dashboard that has been reviewed

What AdiHub handles for you

  • Quality checks that run automatically on every data load
  • Access by role and data scope: university, college or unit, department, individual
  • Metric definitions for every module, written from public standards
  • A log of every change

Your team’s part is small: name an owner for each dashboard, by job title, and have a second person approve it before it goes live.

Governance recordRetention & Early Alerts
CertifiedSample
  • OwnerVice Provost for Student Success
  • Built byInstitutional Research Analyst · Aug 2026
  • Definitions6 metrics, each with its formula
  • Quality checks5 of 5 passed
  • Approved byDirector of Institutional Research · Sep 2026
Sample record for Angelsee University, a fictional institution.See a full governance record
The platform

Yours to run, audit and extend.

AdiHub is delivered as software your institution operates, not a shared service that holds your data.

Runs on your servers

AdiHub and its database run on your institution’s own Linux server or cloud. Your data stays under your controls.

Source code per subscription

You receive the source code of the modules you subscribe to, under a license for your institution’s own use, so your security team can audit how every number is produced.

Dashboards your staff build stay yours

Build your own dashboards on the same hub. Share one with us only if you choose, and only its design travels, with generated sample data.

Better with every release

Versioned releases with documented upgrade steps bring every subscribing institution the improvements built for all of them.

Getting your data in

Each dashboard defines the data it needs once, and every way of loading data uses those same definitions.

  1. Step 1

    A template for every dashboard

    Download an Excel template that lists every data element the dashboard uses, with each one’s name, type and definition.

  2. Step 2a

    Upload the filled template

    Fill in the template and upload it. AdiHub checks each column against the definitions before any number changes on screen.

  3. Step 2b

    Or connect your systems

    We build the data pipeline with your IT staff: extracting from your student, finance and research systems, mapping each field to the dashboard’s definitions, and checking every load before a number changes on screen. Connecting a system is usually the largest part of an implementation, so we scope it with you before work starts.

How AdiHub runs at your institution
Views and themes

More detail or less, in your institution’s colors.

Ample and Cozy views

Ample, the default, shows everything on the page: the question each chart answers, its source, definition and method notes. Cozy is for people who use a dashboard every day: those notes move behind a “?” button and tiles tighten, so more fits on one screen. Each person picks their view, and it applies on every dashboard. Values, changes and the Sample label always stay visible, and printed or exported pages keep their sources.

Research expenditures, year to dateSample
Question: Is research spending on track to pass last year’s total, and which colleges are driving the change?$48.2M▲ 6.3% from the same point last yearDirect and indirect spending on sponsored and institutionally funded research from July 1, counted as the NSF HERD survey defines it. Source: general ledger and award ledger, Sep 30, 2026Ample
Research expenditures, year to dateSample?
$48.2M▲ 6.3% from the same point last yearCozy
Sample tile for Angelsee University, a fictional institution.

Your institution’s colors

An institution admin can set the hub’s colors to match the institution’s own: the header band, buttons, links and chart colors. AdiHub checks every choice against WCAG 2.1 AA contrast before it applies, and keeps the colors for status (up, down, on track) and the Sample label fixed, so every chart stays readable.

Angelsee UniversityShare
Default AdiHub colors
Your InstitutionShare
Your institution’s colors
Built for review

Ready for your security, accessibility and data offices.

Every number is traceable

Each panel shows its source and data date, and every metric comes from a documented, repeatable calculation.

Accessible by design

Dashboards target WCAG 2.1 AA. Every chart has a table view and a CSV download, so no value depends on color alone.

Access by role

Sign-in by emailed link, with a second factor for administrators, and each role sees only the data its work requires. Single sign-on through your identity provider follows in the first release after v1.0.

Sample data is always labelled

Demonstration data comes from a fictional institution and says so on every page and export.

Visit the Trust Center

See where AdiHub fits your institution.

Tell us which offices and systems are involved. We reply within three business days.